Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Nokia |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-03-09 | 2019-03-03 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is slightly better than Nokia 9 PureView, having an 82.5 score against 76.4. The LG V30S ThinQ construction is just a little lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Nokia 9 PureView, even though it was released only 12 months before. Nokia 9 PureView has a little sharper screen than LG V30S ThinQ. Both have a better pixel count in each inch of screen, exactly the same resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a display of the same size.
LG V30S ThinQ has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Nokia 9 PureView has a bit better performance than LG V30S ThinQ. They have a Octa-Core processor and 6 GB of RAM memory.
LG V30S ThinQ shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a smaller sensor which offers a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a bigger aperture and a much more mega-pixels camera.
Nokia 9 PureView's battery lifetime is just as good as LG V30S ThinQ's battery life, although the Nokia 9 PureView also has 3320mAh of battery capacity.
The LG V30S ThinQ costs more money than Nokia 9 PureView, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.