Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Nokia |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2021-07-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | -- |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is a bit better than Nokia XR20, having a score of 82.5 against 80.8. LG V30S ThinQ's construction is lighter and thinner than Nokia XR20, even though it was released 3 years before. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V30S ThinQ has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and Nokia XR20 has Android 11, so it offers some nice extra features.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little sharper screen than Nokia XR20, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. LG V30S ThinQ features a bit faster CPU than Nokia XR20. Both have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Nokia XR20 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light images, and they both have the same video resolution, the Nokia XR20 also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a much larger sensor providing a way better image quality and a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Nokia XR20, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Nokia XR20 has a really longer battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Nokia XR20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Nokia XR20. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy LG V30S ThinQ, else you can save some money and buy the Nokia XR20, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.