Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-03-09 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S, having a overall score of 82.5 against 75.8. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the LG V30S ThinQ has an older 8.0 Oreo version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. LG V30S ThinQ's body is noticeably lighter and thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S, although it was released about a year before.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features just a little better processing power than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM. The LG V30S ThinQ features just a bit better display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels quantity in each inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a much better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a much higher video quality. The LG V30S ThinQ features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a very superior battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent more battery size.
LG V30S ThinQ costs a lot more money than nubia Red Magic 3S, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.