Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has an overall score of 82.5, which is just a bit better than OPPO Find X2's 79.7 score. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but LG V30S ThinQ has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and OPPO Find X2 has Android 10. LG V30S ThinQ's body is lighter and just a bit thinner than OPPO Find X2, although it was released 2 years before.
The OPPO Find X2 has a little better processing power than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 has a little sharper screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a just a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a bit higher 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution.
OPPO Find X2 counts with a much better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same video quality, the OPPO Find X2 also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality photos and videos, a way more megapixels back camera and faster video frame rates.
LG V30S ThinQ has a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X2, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The OPPO Find X2 counts with greater battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.