Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-05-21 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, getting an 82.5 score against 77.7. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but LG V30S ThinQ has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10 version, so it gives you some extra features and optimized performance. The LG V30S ThinQ construction is just a bit lighter and just a bit thinner than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it was released 2 years before.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a little better processing power than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a greater amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a little more vivid screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a bit worse pixels density and a way worse 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a quite larger screen.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The OPPO Find X2 Neo takes much better photos and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a much larger camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and photos and a camera in the back with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features better battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4025mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.