Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro is slightly better than the LG V30S ThinQ, having an 83.1 score against 82.5. The OPPO Find X2 Pro construction is way newer, but a lot heavier and thicker than LG V30S ThinQ. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the OPPO Find X2 Pro has the older 10 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit sharper display than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a just a little lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3168 and a bit larger display. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit bigger storage to store more apps and games than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little better performance than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 Pro takes greater videos and photos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos, a camera with a much higher resolution and faster video frame rate.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with longer battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.