Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-03-09 | -- |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a global score of 82.5, which is slightly better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's overall score of 77. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V30S ThinQ has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11 version, providing you some nice extra features and better performance. LG V30S ThinQ's body is just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a bit faster processing unit than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a little worse display density, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with much more memory capacity for apps and games than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG V30S ThinQ has a very superior battery lifetime than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G takes better photos and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light images and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.