Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2021-12-03 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a score of 82.5, which is a bit better than Galaxy A13 5G's global score of 82.1. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but LG V30S ThinQ has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while Galaxy A13 5G has Android 12 version, so it gives you a couple nice extra features and a performance increase. Despite of the fact that the LG V30S ThinQ is notably older than Galaxy A13 5G, it's design is lighter and thinner.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a lot better screen density. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM.
The Galaxy A13 5G takes clearer photographs and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has a much longer battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.