Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-03-09 | 2019-10-05 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 537 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is just a bit better than the Galaxy A20s, with a global score of 82.5 against 77. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V30S ThinQ has newer 8.0 Oreo version while Galaxy A20s has Android 11, giving you some nice extra features and a performance increase. The LG V30S ThinQ is an older cellphone than the Galaxy A20s, but LG could make it lighter and just a bit thinner anyway.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A20s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater display pixel density and a much higher 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a superior camera than Galaxy A20s, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images and video in low light situations, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a better 16 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
LG V30S ThinQ features a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A20s, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A20s has improved battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.