Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 537 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G76 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a score of 82.5, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A21s's score of 77.7. Even though the LG V30S ThinQ is extremely older than the Samsung Galaxy A21s, it's design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V30S ThinQ has newer 8.0 Oreo version and Samsung Galaxy A21s has Android 10 version, so it provides you a lot of extra features.
LG V30S ThinQ features a way better display than Galaxy A21s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1440 x 2880px resolution and a lot better pixel amount per inch of screen. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy A21s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A21s takes slightly better photos and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A21s also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor and a camera with a way better resolution.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A21s, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A21s features a way better battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.