Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2021-07-02 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a global score of 82.5, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A22's global score of 76.1. These devices have Android OS, but LG V30S ThinQ has newer 8.0 Oreo version while Samsung Galaxy A22 has Android 12 version, giving some nice extra features. LG V30S ThinQ's design is lighter and thinner than Samsung Galaxy A22, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A22, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a much better display density. The LG V30S ThinQ has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The LG V30S ThinQ shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a lot lower 16 mega-pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture and a lot higher video definition. LG V30S ThinQ features a superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy A22, because it has an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal memory.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.