Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2021-06-24 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 5G has a general score of 84.6, which is just a bit better than the LG V30S ThinQ's 82.5 global score. The Galaxy A22 5G body is incredibly newer, but notably heavier and somewhat thicker than LG V30S ThinQ. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A22 5G has older 11 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The LG V30S ThinQ has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM. LG V30S ThinQ features just a bit better screen than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a better pixel density.
LG V30S ThinQ has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A22 5G, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a much better battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G takes slightly better photographs and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light captures, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a back camera with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.