Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has an overall score of 82.5, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 global score. Both phones in this comparison work with Android operating system, but the LG V30S ThinQ has 8.0 Oreo version and Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14. Despite of the fact that LG V30S ThinQ is extremely older than Galaxy A25 5G, it's design is thinner and lighter.
LG V30S ThinQ has a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and a 6 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little more vivid display than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a lot worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a much worse pixel density, it also counts with a quite bigger screen.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a much better battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 52% bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a lot better 50 megapixels resolution camera and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.