Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-03-09 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a global score of 82.5, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A30s's overall score of 79.8. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but LG V30S ThinQ has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while Samsung Galaxy A30s has Android 11. Despite of the fact that the LG V30S ThinQ is older than the Samsung Galaxy A30s, it's construction is just a little bit lighter and a little thinner.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and way more pixels per inch of display. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
LG V30S ThinQ has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM memory. LG V30S ThinQ features a bit better camera than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a much worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video definition and a bigger aperture to capture better images and video in low light environments.
The Galaxy A30s has better battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.