Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 13 |
| 2018-03-09 | -- |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 5.57 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A34 has a global score of 82.9, which is slightly better than LG V30S ThinQ's 82.5 overall score. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A34 has the older 13 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Samsung Galaxy A34 body is extremely lighter and extremely thinner than the LG V30S ThinQ.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a slightly better screen than Galaxy A34, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px. Samsung Galaxy A34's processing unit is just as good as LG V30S ThinQ's CPU, and although the Samsung Galaxy A34 has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
LG V30S ThinQ and Galaxy A34 have really similar cameras, because although the Galaxy A34 has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs or videos in low light environments, it also counts with a way more megapixels back camera and a way larger sensor shooting lot better quality pictures.
LG V30S ThinQ has much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A34 features a way better battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.