Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, with an 82.5 score against 79.4. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V30S ThinQ has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14, providing a couple additional features and better performance. Despite of the fact that the LG V30S ThinQ is older than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, it's design is a little thinner and much lighter.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a much more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A35 5G. They have a Octa-Core CPU and a 6 GB RAM. The LG V30S ThinQ features a little bit better screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a better screen pixels density.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a superior battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G captures much clearer photographs and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a camera with much more mega pixels and a much larger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.