Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A41, with an 82.5 score against 81.7. LG V30S ThinQ's design is just a little thinner than Samsung Galaxy A41, although it's just a little heavier and was released many years before. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the LG V30S ThinQ has newer 8.0 Oreo version while Samsung Galaxy A41 has Android 11 version.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. The LG V30S ThinQ has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A41, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher pixel quantity per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
Samsung Galaxy A41 shoots better videos and photos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also counts with a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a way larger sensor taking much higher quality pictures and videos.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A41 features a bit longer battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.