Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the LG V30S ThinQ, having a 90.8 score against 82.5. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the older 11 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's design is noticeably newer, but somewhat heavier and thicker than LG V30S ThinQ.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. The LG V30S ThinQ has just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a greater screen density.
Galaxy A51 5G features a superior camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor taking much better quality photos and videos and a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has longer battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A51 5G is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.