Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is better than the LG V30S ThinQ, getting a score of 91.3 against 82.5. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy A52 5G has the older 12 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Galaxy A52 5G is a notably newer device than LG V30S ThinQ, but it is heavier and thicker.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A52 5G. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and 6 GB of RAM. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better count of pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The Galaxy A52 5G captures way better pictures and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking photographs and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a much bigger sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality and a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features greater battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.