Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s is much better than the LG V30S ThinQ, having a general score of 91.1 against 82.5. Even though Galaxy A52s is way newer than LG V30S ThinQ, it is heavier and thicker. Both phones we compare here come with Android operating system, but Galaxy A52s has an older 11 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. LG V30S ThinQ features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A52s. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount.
Galaxy A52s takes much better videos and photos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a much bigger sensor providing a much better image quality and a much more mega-pixels camera.
LG V30S ThinQ has a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A52s counts with improved battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 36% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.