Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-03-09 | 2018-05-22 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is just a bit better than the Galaxy A6, with an 82.5 score against 75.8. LG V30S ThinQ is a just a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter cellphone than the Galaxy A6, even though both were released with only a couple of months difference. LG V30S ThinQ has just a little better performance than Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a much higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution, a little bit larger screen and much more pixels per screen inch. The LG V30S ThinQ takes just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier camera sensor offering a lower image quality, and they both have a back facing camera with a 16 MP resolution, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures and video in low light environments.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A6, because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a bit better battery life than Galaxy A6, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A6. So if you need that extra features, you can buy LG V30S ThinQ, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy A6, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.