Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-03-09 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a global score of 82.5, which is a bit better than Galaxy A70's score of 76.9. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V30S ThinQ has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, so it counts with a lot of extra features and performance improvements. LG V30S ThinQ is an older cellphone than Galaxy A70, but LG could make it lighter and a bit thinner.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A70. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. The LG V30S ThinQ features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a better 1440 x 2880px resolution.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller sensor taking less light and washed colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better low light captures and videos.
LG V30S ThinQ has a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A70 counts with better battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A70. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Galaxy A70, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.