Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 has a score of 87.5, which is a little bit better than LG V30S ThinQ's global score of 82.5. Galaxy A71's body is newer than LG V30S ThinQ's, but it is a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. These phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy A71 has the previous 11 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A71, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a greater pixel density. The LG V30S ThinQ features a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A71, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V30S ThinQ features a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A71. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. The Samsung Galaxy A71 has improved battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A71 counts with a lot better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality and a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy A71 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.