Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than LG V30S ThinQ, having a score of 92.9 against 82.5. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A71 5G UW has an older 10 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo. Galaxy A71 5G UW's body is much newer, but thicker and heavier than the LG V30S ThinQ.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a processing unit that's just as good as the LG V30S ThinQ one, and although the Galaxy A71 5G UW has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880px resolution and a better display pixel density.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW captures a lot better pictures and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a much better resolution back camera and a much bigger back camera sensor shooting much better quality photos.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A71 5G UW has longer battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 36 percent greater battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is also by far the cheapest one, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.