Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-10-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F41 has a general score of 85.2, which is a little bit better than LG V30S ThinQ's score of 82.5. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy F41 has 11 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Galaxy F41 design is incredibly newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than LG V30S ThinQ.
LG V30S ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy F41, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. LG V30S ThinQ has a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy F41, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V30S ThinQ features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy F41. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 CPU cores. Galaxy F41 counts with a lot better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a much better resolution back camera and a way larger sensor capturing much higher quality pictures.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 has a very superior battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has an 82 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.