Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is slightly better than LG V30S ThinQ, getting a score of 88.1 against 82.5. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy F62 has older 11 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo. Samsung Galaxy F62's body is much newer than LG V30S ThinQ's, but it is notably thicker and notably heavier.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and more pixels per screen inch. The LG V30S ThinQ features a greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG V30S ThinQ features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a larger number of cores. Galaxy F62 counts with a much better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back and a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy F62 features a very superior battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.