Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-03-09 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is better than the LG V30S ThinQ's 82.5 general score. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo, so it offers some nice extra features and performance optimizations. Samsung Galaxy Fold's body is newer and a little thinner, but also a lot heavier than the LG V30S ThinQ.
Galaxy Fold has a bit more powerful CPU than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. The LG V30S ThinQ features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and more pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy Fold has a little bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Fold counts with a slightly better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a back-facing camera with much less MP resolution and a lower (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor and a larger aperture for better low light captures.
The Galaxy Fold counts with longer battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 33% larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot more expensive than the LG V30S ThinQ, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.