Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2021-03-18 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, blue and white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | PLS |
| 537 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has an overall score of 82.5, which is a bit better than the Galaxy M12's 80 general score. Even though LG V30S ThinQ is much older than Galaxy M12, it's body is way thinner and incredibly lighter. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V30S ThinQ has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while Galaxy M12 has Android 10.
LG V30S ThinQ has an incredibly better screen than Galaxy M12, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch of display and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px. LG V30S ThinQ features a little bit better performance than Galaxy M12, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M12, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M12 features a little bit better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy M12 also counts with a much higher resolution camera.
Galaxy M12 features a much better battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.