Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-09-11 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 537 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 has an overall score of 87.7, which is a bit better than LG V30S ThinQ's 82.5 score. The Samsung Galaxy M51 construction is incredibly newer, but extremely thicker and notably heavier than the LG V30S ThinQ. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy M51 has an older 10 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo.
LG V30S ThinQ has a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a better pixel density. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy M51. Both have 8 processing cores and the same RAM memory amount.
LG V30S ThinQ features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy M51 captures greater pictures and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a camera in the back with lot more megapixels and a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a superior battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 112 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.