Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is better than LG V30S ThinQ, with a score of 90.8 against 82.5. Galaxy Note 20 is a newer device than LG V30S ThinQ, although it's somewhat thicker and heavier. LG V30S ThinQ has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and more pixels per screen inch.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a little better performance than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 captures just a bit better videos and photos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a much worse 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot better video resolution and a much larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with greater battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The Galaxy Note 20 costs a little more money than LG V30S ThinQ, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.