Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is better than LG V30S ThinQ, getting a 98.9 score against 82.5. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is incredibly newer, but just a little thicker and much heavier than the LG V30S ThinQ.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little bit better processing power than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and LG V30S ThinQ count with quite similar displays, because although the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little inferior pixel count in each inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a larger screen.
LG V30S ThinQ has a quite bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features longer battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a lot better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way higher video quality, a way more MP camera and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs more money than LG V30S ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.