Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-01-21 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 Lite is a bit better than LG V30S ThinQ, getting an 86.2 score against 82.5. Galaxy Note10 Lite is a newer cellphone than the LG V30S ThinQ, although it is heavier and somewhat thicker. These phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy Note10 Lite has the previous 11 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a little better hardware performance than LG V30S ThinQ. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a better 1440 x 2880px resolution.
LG V30S ThinQ has a greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite captures a little bit better photographs and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and videos in low-light environments, a lot less mega-pixels back facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has better battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 36% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.