Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-03-09 | 2014-09-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is slightly better than Galaxy Note4, with an 82.5 score against 77.6. The LG V30S ThinQ is a extremely newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat lighter and thinner than Galaxy Note4. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Note4, because it has a just a little greater pixels number in each screen inch, a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a bit larger screen.
LG V30S ThinQ has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. The LG V30S ThinQ features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note4, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Note4, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 3220mAh. The Samsung Galaxy Note4's camera is just as good as LG V30S ThinQ's camera, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note4 has a much tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photography, and they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video definition and a same resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.