Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-03-09 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is just a bit better than the LG V30S ThinQ, getting a overall score of 88.3 against 82.5. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S10 has the older 11 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Galaxy S10 is a newer and a little lighter phone than LG V30S ThinQ, although it is just a little thicker.
Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy S10 features a little sharper display than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a little bit larger display, a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a bit higher pixel count per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 features just a bit better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a camera with a much lower resolution and a lower video definition, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images and a larger back camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S10, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a little better battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Galaxy S10 is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.