Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-03-09 | 2019-05-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is much better than LG V30S ThinQ, having a 93.6 score against 82.5. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's design is newer than the LG V30S ThinQ's, but it's noticeably heavier and a little thicker. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has older 11 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy S10 5G and LG V30S ThinQ have extremely similar displays, because although the Galaxy S10 5G has a quite inferior count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a slightly better 1440 x 3040 resolution. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy S10 5G features superior battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 36 percent larger battery size.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little bit better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video resolution and a much less megapixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better images and video in low light situations and a bigger camera sensor.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy S10 5G is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.