Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE has a global score of 90.8, which is better than the LG V30S ThinQ's 82.5 overall score. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 FE has the previous 11 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Galaxy S20 FE body is a lot newer than the LG V30S ThinQ's, but it's somewhat thicker and heavier.
The Galaxy S20 FE features a little faster processor than LG V30S ThinQ. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little bit better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, a worse (4K) video definition and a much lower 12 mega pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a way bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality. LG V30S ThinQ has a bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with improved battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 FE is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.