Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2021-01-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.97 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gray, Phantom pink, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 722.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S21 is much better than the LG V30S ThinQ, getting a general score of 91.8 against 82.5. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S21 has 11 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo. Although Galaxy S21 is incredibly newer than the LG V30S ThinQ, it's just a little heavier and just a bit thicker.
Galaxy S21 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S21 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S21 has a bit more vivid display than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit inferior pixels number per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S21 has a bit better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a back facing camera with a much lower 12 mega pixels resolution and a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a way larger back camera sensor. The LG V30S ThinQ features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S21, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S21 counts with improved battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 21 percent larger battery size.
The Galaxy S21 is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.