Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 13, 12 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 has a general score of 93.4, which is better than LG V30S ThinQ's 82.5 global score. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy S22 has the previous 13 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Galaxy S22's design is a lot newer than LG V30S ThinQ's, but it's a little bit heavier and a bit thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a better looking screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit lower quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bit bigger display. Samsung Galaxy S22 and LG V30S ThinQ both have incredibly similar processing units, and although the Samsung Galaxy S22 has 2 GB more RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S22 counts with a way better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light photography, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video quality, a much higher resolution back facing camera and a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
LG V30S ThinQ features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S22 features a little longer battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Galaxy S22 is also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.