Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 13, 12 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is much better than the LG V30S ThinQ's 82.5 score. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has the previous 13 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Galaxy S22 Ultra design is notably newer than LG V30S ThinQ's, although it is somewhat thicker and notably heavier.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a brighter screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a little worse pixels count per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 3088px resolution and a little bit larger display. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V30S ThinQ features a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots greater photos and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a back camera with lot more MP and a lot better video resolution.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Galaxy S22 Ultra is more expensive than the LG V30S ThinQ, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.