Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-03-09 | -- |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 5.57 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 is a bit better than LG V30S ThinQ, getting a score of 82.6 against 82.5. The Samsung Galaxy S25 design is extremely lighter and incredibly thinner than the LG V30S ThinQ. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S25 has an older 14 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a better screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a just a bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen. LG V30S ThinQ has an extremely better CPU than Galaxy S25, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S25, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy S25 shoots a lot better pictures and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for taking pictures and video in low-light situations, it also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega pixels, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and pictures and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has superior battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, the Galaxy S25 is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.