Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-03-09 | -- |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 5.57 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is a bit better than LG V30S ThinQ's 82.5 general score. Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is extremely thinner and extremely lighter than LG V30S ThinQ. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S25 Ultra has the previous 14 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better looking screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a bit inferior amount of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 3088px resolution and a little larger display. The LG V30S ThinQ has a much better memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a very superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a way better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures or videos in low light environments, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a way bigger camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality and a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features a very superior battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.