Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-03-09 | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has an overall score of 82.5, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S7's 79.5 general score. The LG V30S ThinQ is a newer and a bit thinner cellphone than the Galaxy S7, but it's a little bit heavier. The LG V30S ThinQ has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a larger number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S7 features a brighter display than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little lower 1440 x 2560px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher count of pixels in each inch of display. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a much more megapixels camera and a bigger aperture.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG V30S ThinQ features a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy S7. So if you want that extra features, you can buy LG V30S ThinQ, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy S7, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.