Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-03-09 | 2016-06-10 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a global score of 82.5, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 general score. LG V30S ThinQ is a newer phone, and it is also incredibly thinner and somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The LG V30S ThinQ has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Galaxy S7 Active features a bit more vivid display than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller display and a quite lower 1440 x 2560px resolution, it also counts with a quite higher number of pixels in each display inch. LG V30S ThinQ shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos and video and a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features greater battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy S7 Active. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy LG V30S ThinQ, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy S7 Active, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.