Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is a bit better than the LG V30S ThinQ's global score of 82.5. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the previous 12 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip design is newer and a little bit thinner, but also heavier than the LG V30S ThinQ.
LG V30S ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a better screen pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit more powerful processor than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a slightly better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a lot lower 12 mega pixels resolution back camera and a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor.
The LG V30S ThinQ and the Galaxy Z Flip have extremely similar battery durations.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip costs a lot more money than the LG V30S ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.