Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a bit better than the LG V30S ThinQ, with an 85.6 score against 82.5. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's construction is incredibly newer and a bit thinner, but somewhat heavier than the LG V30S ThinQ. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has 11 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit more powerful processing unit than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. LG V30S ThinQ has a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and more pixels per display inch.
LG V30S ThinQ has a much greater memory for apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 and LG V30S ThinQ feature extremely similar batteries.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a camera with lot more megapixels and a bigger diafragm aperture for better images and video in low light situations.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 costs a little more money than LG V30S ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.