Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is better than the LG V30S ThinQ's score of 82.5. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has older 11 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is heavier than LG V30S ThinQ, it's a bit thinner and also notably newer.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a little better processing power than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory. The LG V30S ThinQ features a slightly better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel count in each inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a slightly better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse resolution, a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photos.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G and LG V30S ThinQ feature extremely similar batteries performance.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.