Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than LG V30S ThinQ, having a global score of 94.6 against 82.5. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an older 11 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is incredibly heavier than the LG V30S ThinQ, it's a little thinner and also a lot newer.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit faster CPU than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a higher screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a slightly better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower resolution, a worse (4K) video resolution and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much larger sensor. The LG V30S ThinQ has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features better battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 costs a lot more than the LG V30S ThinQ, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.