Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is slightly better than LG V30S ThinQ, having a general score of 90.6 against 82.5. Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a way newer and thinner cellphone than LG V30S ThinQ, although it's way heavier. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an older 11 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. LG V30S ThinQ has a slightly better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 2880px resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot larger aperture for better photos and videos in low light environments and a way more megapixels back-facing camera. The LG V30S ThinQ has much more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features longer battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.