Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 94.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Sony |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2021-01-26 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.70 x 3.00 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 2500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3840 x 1644 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 643 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 22.92 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia PRO is better than the LG V30S ThinQ, getting a score of 94.3 against 82.5. These devices use Android OS, but the Xperia PRO has the older 10 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo. Xperia PRO's body is a lot newer than LG V30S ThinQ's, although it's a lot heavier and a lot thicker.
Sony Xperia PRO has just a bit better processing power than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Sony Xperia PRO also has more RAM. Xperia PRO counts with a little more vivid display than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a higher 1644 x 3840 resolution, a little larger screen and a little higher display pixel density.
The Xperia PRO counts with a slightly better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a back facing camera with a much worse 12 megapixels resolution and a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light images, it also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Xperia PRO features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Sony Xperia PRO counts with longer battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 21 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Sony Xperia PRO is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V30S ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V30S ThinQ. If you want to save some money, you can buy the LG V30S ThinQ, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.