Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Sony |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-03-09 | 2017-04-05 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is just a bit better than the Xperia XZs, having an 82.5 score against 77.2. LG V30S ThinQ is a newer cellphone, and it is also a bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the Xperia XZs. The LG V30S ThinQ features a bit more vivid screen than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a higher pixels count per inch in the display, a larger display and a way better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The LG V30S ThinQ has just a bit better performance than Xperia XZs, because it has 4 more processing cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit superior battery life than Xperia XZs, because it has a 14% larger battery size. Sony Xperia XZs captures much clearer videos and photos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Sony Xperia XZs also counts with a back-facing camera with more mega-pixels, higher 960 fps video frame rate and a lot bigger back camera sensor.
The LG V30S ThinQ costs more than Xperia XZs, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.